|
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| High Level Programming Post questions about C, C++, Java, SQL, and other programming languages here. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pointers | Milla | High Level Programming | 2 | 11-03-2007 05:13 AM |
| Pure Virtual Function in C++ | krishna_sicsr | High Level Programming | 1 | 06-03-2007 05:11 PM |
| pointers | areef4u | High Level Programming | 4 | 08-05-2006 06:08 PM |
| sharing of IP address for load sharing avoiding virtual server & redirection machine | Rakesh Ranjan | IP Networking | 2 | 08-25-2005 02:45 PM |
| Regarding Function and Pointers. | S.Vishwanath | High Level Programming | 0 | 05-25-2004 09:15 AM |
Powered by 
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
01-24-2002
|
||||
|
||||
Sharing C++ Objects with virtual function table pointers
I am pondering the next question:
Can I safely sare objects that have virtual functions (i.e. have virtual function table pointers) between two processes ? Where will the pointers point to in each process ? What I am afraid of is that in the creating process the pointer will indeed point to the virtual function table, but in the sharing process that pointer will point at junk.  Can anyone calm me or maybe confirm my fears ? Thank you ! |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Threaded Mode
