|
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| High Level Programming Post questions about C, C++, Java, SQL, and other programming languages here. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Shared memory in shared library | DreamWarrior | High Level Programming | 12 | 05-30-2007 05:33 PM |
| all about shared memory | vijaya2006 | Linux | 0 | 02-28-2006 04:14 AM |
| mmap vs shared memory - which is best for sharing data between applications? | nmds | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 2 | 02-21-2005 06:45 PM |
| Shared memory shortage but lots of unused memory | cjcamaro | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 1 | 10-13-2004 06:10 PM |
| Shared Memory | Jayathirtha | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 3 | 03-03-2003 12:30 PM |
Powered by 
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
04-23-2007
|
|||||
|
|||||
memory sharing - not shared memory -
hi, this is the problem: i want to swap a linked list between 4 processes (unrelated), is there any way i can do that just by sending a pointer to a structure? Code:
//example
typedef struct node
{
int x;
char c;
struct node *next;
} node;
or i should send the items ( x,c ) by value and reconstruct the list ? my solution: create the list in a shared location in memory, where all the processes can use the same reference to manipulate or read the list, but if i use malloc(); i can't control the physical place where the memory is allocated (that's what i know)  any help guys is appreciated, thanks |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Threaded Mode
