![]() |
Hello and Welcome from to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| High Level Programming Post questions about C, C++, Java, SQL, and other programming languages here. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| message queues and multi-process | rvan | High Level Programming | 10 | 09-05-2007 03:06 AM |
| UNIX Message Queues vs. Sockets | zen29sky | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 2 | 03-21-2007 01:56 PM |
| maximun number of message queues | princelinux | Linux | 4 | 09-09-2006 08:10 AM |
| message queues | sukaam | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 2 | 07-22-2005 05:41 AM |
| Message queues | mgchato | High Level Programming | 9 | 05-31-2005 12:15 AM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
||||
|
shared memory and message queues
Hi,
According to my understanding.. When message queues are used, when a process post a message in the queue and if another process reads it from the queue then the queue will be empty unlike shared memory where n number of processess can access the shared memory and still the contents remain there until its deliberately removed. So when i want to use an IPC between processess and i want the contents to be there until deliberately removed i feel shared memory is the option and not the message queues.. could anyone please clarify me? Thanks |
|
||||
|
Please check out Beej's Guide to Unix Interprocess Communication - it is very helpful.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|