The UNIX and Linux Forums  
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Top Forums > High Level Programming
.
google unix.com



High Level Programming Post questions about C, C++, Java, SQL, and other programming languages here.

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
static and shared libraries JamesByars UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users 2 01-13-2008 02:29 PM
Shared Libraries wojtyla Linux 1 09-16-2005 12:14 AM
Paths for finding own shared libraries vital UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users 0 03-22-2005 10:29 AM
Clarification about shared Libraries ramkumar_gr UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 3 11-17-2003 07:59 AM
shared libraries thalex High Level Programming 2 11-29-2001 09:32 AM

Closed Thread
English Japanese Spanish French German Portuguese Italian Dutch Swedish Russian Norwegian Hungarian Hebrew Danish Powered by Powered by Google
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-12-2001
Micky Micky is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 16
Shared libraries

Hello everybody,

I am having major problems at the moment with shared libraries and I have to little knowledge of them to solve them. So please, please help me

Ok this is the problem:

I have a library A, which uses B and C, and C uses again D.

If I try to run A as plugin in apache, it says C doesn't find D ( unresolved, etc).

I have the suspission that it has to do with the way we make our stuff. We use omake. I can change the compiler "severity" of it, due to a lot of problems I will rather not explain here. The thing is that someone stated it would be enough to put all the -l<lib> options on higher level.

So in my example this would mean that the makefile of libA contains the following options :-lB -lC -lD, and the other makefiles didn't need references to the libs they are using.

But that doesn't seem to work. Lib C still complains about unresolves ( but only runtime!! ), although the file is there and in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

Does someone have a good article, or some hints for me, how to compile the .so files so they will run without unresolves? Where should I include the -l options?

Miriam
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Language Translations Powered by .
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2009. All Rights Reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0