|
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| High Level Programming Post questions about C, C++, Java, SQL, and other programming languages here. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| White Paper on Storage Considerations for Accelerating Databases | iBot | Solaris BigAdmin RSS | 0 | 10-26-2009 05:45 PM |
| Mac OS X v10.5: Active Directory - Name and password considerations when binding with | iBot | OS X Support RSS | 0 | 07-20-2009 05:00 PM |
| Application Performance Considerations for Sun SPARC Enterprise M-Series Servers | iBot | Solaris BigAdmin RSS | 0 | 01-08-2009 09:30 AM |
| How Can a Machine Reads a Compiler Since A Compiler is Written in Text! Not Binaries? | f.ben.isaac | High Level Programming | 12 | 11-14-2008 11:25 AM |
| AIX 5.3 gcc compiler | cipher#1 | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 0 | 07-30-2007 10:50 AM |
Powered by 
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
4 Weeks Ago
|
||||
|
||||
|
If you're using i386, it's time to upgrade.
 The basic i686 architecture has taken over for at least a decade now, covering the vast majority of the 32-bit world of processors. A lot of distros don't support i386 any more because that architecture is missing some important fundamental instructions now depended on for things like IPC.Your compiler can probably generate code for x86 processors and nothing else. Most compilers aren't configured to generate code for anything except their native platform. |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Threaded Mode
