![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers If you're not sure where to post a UNIX or Linux question, post it here. All UNIX and Linux newbies welcome !! |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Interrupts problems | By_Jam | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 2 | 03-28-2007 03:44 AM |
| How to bind interrupts on a specific CPU | urbale | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 1 | 03-10-2006 01:09 PM |
| SNMP traps | Ajwat | SUN Solaris | 1 | 09-21-2005 07:35 AM |
| catching interrupts | toughguy2handle | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 09-19-2005 03:17 PM |
| Does unix use interrupts? | Frank_M | Filesystems, Disks and Memory | 6 | 09-18-2002 08:20 AM |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Traps and Interrupts
Well, I don't know where exactly to ask this doubt so I'm asking in the newbie section. I was reading about traps and interrupts when I thought of traps as something that cease the control of the OS from the user and interrupts that cease the control yet provide support for multitasking. Am I right in thinking that? In that case, I think we can generate traps using our programs but why would we want to do it anyways? I mean when interrupts are proving better ways of handling the transfer of control, what use would we have for a trap?
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|