The UNIX and Linux Forums  


Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Special Forums > IP Networking
.
google unix.com



IP Networking Learn TCP/IP, Internet Protocol, Routing, Routers, Network protocols in this UNIX and Linux forum.

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Real memory usage is reaching 99.99% Balajipoola007 AIX 2 04-01-2009 06:26 AM
Linux LiveCD Router 2.0.40 (Default Router branch) iBot Software Releases - RSS News 0 12-27-2008 09:20 AM
Linux LiveCD Router 2.0.30 (Default Router branch) iBot Software Releases - RSS News 0 09-05-2008 08:50 AM
Linux LiveCD Router 2.0.29 (Default Router branch) iBot Software Releases - RSS News 0 06-17-2008 02:10 AM
Linux LiveCD Router 2.0.27 (Default Router branch) iBot Software Releases - RSS News 0 05-14-2008 08:30 PM

 
English Japanese Spanish French German Portuguese Italian Dutch Swedish Russian Norwegian Hungarian Hebrew Danish Bulgarian Greek Powered by Powered by Google
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2009
jalburger jalburger is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 69
trouble reaching local router interface

I have a processor (Solaris 5.8) with a router locally attached.

We're having trouble pinging the router interface from the processor with a normal ping command. The response from the router is "administratively prohibited", which normally indicates the access list on the router is bouncing the icmp request back.

However, when I issue the ping command with the '-r' parameter (ping -r x.x.x.x), the response is immediately successful. When using '-r', the TTL is limited to one, and the ping is sent to a host on an attached network. The man pages state that normal routing tables are bypassed.

With both methods, our network capture shows icmp leaving x.x.x.104 (solaris processor) destined for x.x.x.126 (router interface). I cannot see much difference besides that in the two packets, besides the TTL.

FWIW, 'netstat -nr' is showing my default gateway to be x.x.x.126.

Anyone have any ideas how I can figure out what's going on?
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Language Translations Powered by .
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2009. All Rights Reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0