![]() |
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Filesystems, Disks and Memory Discuss NAS, SAN, RAID, Robotic Libraries, backup devices, RAM, DRAM, SCSI, IDE, EIDE topics here. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Reg. VXVM | kurva | SUN Solaris | 7 | 03-10-2009 12:25 AM |
| Mpxio | victorinox | SUN Solaris | 1 | 12-08-2008 12:10 PM |
| Mpxio | mailbox80 | SUN Solaris | 3 | 10-15-2008 08:04 AM |
| VxVM softpartitions | pressy | SUN Solaris | 3 | 10-27-2006 07:15 PM |
| VxVM | andy11983 | SUN Solaris | 3 | 01-14-2005 01:10 PM |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
VxVM and MPxIO
![]() Last week I read that VxVM won't work with MPxIO (i don't recall the link) and that it should be unconfigured when installing VxVM. Today I read that VxVM works in "pass-thru" mode with MPxIO and DMP uses the devices presented by MPxIO. If I create disks with MPxIO and use VxVM to create volumes for my DBAs, do I get reduced functionality/reliability if something fails? -OR- Should I install VxVM (or the broader package: Veritas Storage Foundation for Oracle RAC) and use the Dynamic multi-pathing (DMP) without MPxIO? Thanks is Advance! |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|