Unix/Linux Go Back    

Hardware Device drivers, hardware compatibility issues, motherboards, disk drives, graphics cards and other hardware related topics.

BackBlaze article on HDD failure rates.


Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Unix and Linux 08-03-2016
wisecracker's Unix or Linux Image
wisecracker wisecracker is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Last Activity: 22 June 2017, 3:16 PM EDT
Location: Loughborough
Posts: 1,210
Thanks: 364
Thanked 322 Times in 252 Posts
BackBlaze article on HDD failure rates.

Very interesting.

One for the pros here...

Hard Drive Failure Rates: The Results from 68,813 Hard Drives
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to wisecracker For This Useful Post:
Corona688 (08-03-2016), hicksd8 (08-03-2016)
Sponsored Links
Old Unix and Linux 08-03-2016
hicksd8 hicksd8 is online now Forum Advisor  
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Last Activity: 28 June 2017, 3:00 AM EDT
Location: Devon, UK
Posts: 1,416
Thanks: 176
Thanked 358 Times in 300 Posts
Wow!!! I'm a bit stunned by this.

I've always regarded Western Digital (WDC) as one of the best brands but perhaps they are now about the worst. However, the best performing (in terms of failures) here is HGST which is wholly owned by Western Digital!!! Eh???

What the heck goes on?
Sponsored Links
Old Unix and Linux 08-03-2016
Corona688 Corona688 is offline Forum Staff  
Mead Rotor
Join Date: Aug 2005
Last Activity: 27 June 2017, 6:48 PM EDT
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 22,256
Thanks: 1,105
Thanked 4,200 Times in 3,885 Posts
I've noticed that these are consumer-class drives, not server-class. I can't remember the last time WD was considered a reliable brand? Back when drives came with defect lists, perhaps. Cheap and cheerful has been WD's strategy, and while it's worked for them, it's also given them a black mark. You can get better from WD if you're willing to pay -- but who would? Given that, I'm not surprised WD bought Hitachi. They needed better drives and a better name, and HGST -- Hitachi -- has been excellent for a long time. Though they have their dark times too, remember the IBM Deathstar? (I'd almost forgotten they were responsible for that...)

That said -- drive reliability went down steadily once capacities exploded into the dozens then hundreds and thousands of gigabytes. The drive industry chopped their warranties from 3 to 1 years long ago to reflect this, they're inevitably more sensitive devices. The number of spare sectors a modern hard drive keeps -- the percentage of sectors which can die and not be considered a fault -- is disturbing.
Old Unix and Linux 08-23-2016
bakunin bakunin is online now Forum Staff  
Bughunter Extraordinaire
Join Date: May 2005
Last Activity: 28 June 2017, 2:50 AM EDT
Location: In the leftmost byte of /dev/kmem
Posts: 5,450
Thanks: 100
Thanked 1,510 Times in 1,120 Posts
Originally Posted by Corona688 View Post
I can't remember the last time WD was considered a reliable brand?
Beginning of the nineties, when the Caviar was way ahead of the competition. That was, before they sold their SCSI chips to Future Domain (which was later bought by Adaptec) sometimes mid-nineties.

Sponsored Links

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Linux More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IBM AIX Internal HDD vs SAN HDD and Oracle filosophizer AIX 7 01-27-2014 05:33 AM
boot up failure unix sco after power failure fredthayer UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 11 03-29-2012 10:24 PM
Scan Rates Negm AIX 2 04-16-2009 10:29 AM
Old HDD copy to new HDD ? im lost... Chevy89rocks UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 5 02-20-2009 02:23 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 AM.