![]() |
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Gentoo Gentoo Linux is a versatile and fast, completely free Linux distribution geared towards developers and network professionals. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Squid+DNS | surfer24 | Linux | 7 | 12-25-2008 02:26 AM |
| Squid dns | beardiebeardie | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 02-25-2008 03:19 AM |
| squid anonymizer | globalvpn | Shell Programming and Scripting | 0 | 02-09-2008 09:20 AM |
| USN-565-1: Squid vulnerability | iBot | Security Advisories (RSS) | 0 | 01-09-2008 07:00 PM |
| Problem with SQUID | chanfle | Linux | 1 | 05-03-2006 01:37 PM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|||||
|
So far...
...this particular question has proven to be hard to answer. Most of my Googling has resulted in the same basic answer which is to set the IE6 browser to use http 1.1 when proxying. I also posted on a Windows list and the people there (who use Squid) recommended making that same change for Squid either by using a logon script or manually editing the appropriate key in the mandatory profile. So this is going to be a hard one to resolve for our Windows admin. There isn't really anything that can be done on the Squid side of the equation since the problem lies within the IE6 browser's implementation of http 1.0. There is supposedly a hotfix, but it's not recommended by MS and isn't included in the latest updates nor will it be in the future. The Windows admin is certain that even if we applied the hotfix (which reverts to an older DLL) that the DLL would be replaced with a newer one from the DLL Cache or overwritten by newer XP or IE updates that are automatically applied by the SUS server. So, the ONLY answer appears to be to find a way to set all proxied browsers to use http 1.1.
![]() |
|
||||
|
Quote:
On a different note, I would seriously question anything I was using that only allowed me to use IE (as opposed to any other browser). Chances are, you have no real reason to even have to use Windows in a corporate environment, especially if your applications are already web-based. Since your critical applications are web based (I'm guessing due to your professed "need"), someone messed up one of the main reasons to have web-based applications to begin with. That being the ability to connect using cheaper, non-proprietary, platform independant clients. On yet another note, if your Windows systems admin doesn't know how to apply group policies to a corporate AD domain, they either need to be replaced or trained or your whole network should be migrated to Linux (mainly for security reasons). IMO Windows doesn't belong on a corporate network to begin with, but if you're not using AD to its full potential someone in charge over there really needs to take another look at the way your infrastructure is operating. I don't mean for this to sound rude, nor am I trying to spout the "joys of open source solutions" to you. Rather, I'm giving you sound advice which may stop a future incident from crippling your infrastructure (and perhaps costing people jobs). |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|