![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Filesystems, Disks and Memory Discuss NAS, SAN, RAID, Robotic Libraries, backup devices, RAM, DRAM, SCSI, IDE, EIDE topics here. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| calculating disk space for growth | sholiver | Filesystems, Disks and Memory | 6 | 04-25-2008 11:28 AM |
| Scripts for calculating size and remaining space of a directory automatically. | leonall | Shell Programming and Scripting | 1 | 12-13-2005 02:30 PM |
| How do I increase disk space available to a directory? | rhack | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 2 | 10-21-2005 11:54 AM |
| Calculating Disc Space | Docboyeee | Filesystems, Disks and Memory | 5 | 06-05-2002 10:06 AM |
| Calculating Disc Space | Docboyeee | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 2 | 04-30-2002 11:40 AM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
||||
|
I trying to calculate drive space with RAID. I know the equation is:
(n-1)/n * drive capacity but, when I use that my calculations don't come out when I compare to what I already know exists: I have 3 - 18.2gb SCSI drives that contain two logical drives C & D. Using the math, (3-1)/3 * 18.2 = 12.1gb usable space per drive. C has: 9.76gb D has: 24.1gb Drive D works out just fine but the C drive should have 12.1gb usable. I am so confused. I need to know how to get the right numbers because my boss wants to know how much gain would come from intalling two additional 18.2gb drives. Is there something I am missing?? I have researched 'til my eyes hurt because until a week ago, I haven't had to deal with calculating hard drive upgrades and such since my first year of college. HELP!! |
|
||||
|
Which RAID level are you using? Normally, RAID abstracts the disk space to the underlying OS and file system. If you are using 18GB drives, and using 3 drives, I assume RAID 5, then you will
A) have to see if your controller or driver will allow expansion to the RAID group. B) Will always have N -1 capacity. The requirements for RAID 5 are 3 drives minimum, with the capacity of a single drive being used across each of the drives for parity. This works out to N -1 all the time. If you had 9GB drives or 146GB drives it would not matter. You will always have N -1. For example, 3 drives using 9GB drives will yield approximately 18GB of usable space. If you had 7 drives in a RAID 5 array, you will have (N -1, or 6 in that case * capacity) ~54GB of space. The drive letters are being created based upon logical layout. That was chosen either by you or the program when it was created. Basically, you as the user of a RAID should not care about individual drive usage. Part of the point of RAID is that it abstracts this. Your system should see 1 device. How you allocate it is up to you as the administrator. With that 1 large abstracted device, you could have carved the logical devices into 200MB chunks. That would have nothing to do with the array. That, I believe, is your problem. Don't focus on usable space per drive, as you are confusing "per drive" with per logical device. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|