Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Special Forums > Hardware > Filesystems, Disks and Memory
google site



Filesystems, Disks and Memory Discuss NAS, SAN, RAID, Robotic Libraries, backup devices, RAM, DRAM, SCSI, IDE, EIDE topics here.

Closed Thread
English Japanese Spanish French German Portuguese Italian Powered by Powered by Google
 
Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 12-07-2009
Registered User
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Munich (Germany)
Posts: 95
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ext4 - ready for production system?

Gidday,

Are you using ext4 for production system? Or is it better to opt for a more
conservative strategy, like ext3 for instance?

What are your experiences?

Thanks in advance,
Loïc.
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 12-07-2009
Neo's Avatar
Neo Neo is online now Forum Staff  
Administrator
 

Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Asia Pacific
Posts: 7,840
Thanks: 28
Thanked 43 Times in 21 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loic Domaigne View Post
Gidday,

Are you using ext4 for production system? Or is it better to opt for a more
conservative strategy, like ext3 for instance?

What are your experiences?

Thanks in advance,
Loïc.
For production, always opt for the conservative strategy.
  #3  
Old 12-07-2009
Registered User
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Munich (Germany)
Posts: 95
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
For production, always opt for the conservative strategy.
Yeah, I know. But since I left the sysadmin scene about 2.5 years ago, I don't know how "off" I am regarding the current "state of the art". It occurred to me that ext4 is a relative recent development, just wanted to be sure.

Cheers,
Loïc.
  #4  
Old 12-07-2009
pludi's Avatar
pludi pludi is offline Forum Staff  
Moderator
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sqrt[-e^(-2 i Pi)]
Posts: 3,925
Thanks: 2
Thanked 83 Times in 77 Posts
The only major distribution that I know has already adopted ext4 is Ubuntu. And what I've been following on various reports on it, Theodor Tso is still adding and modifying features ,mostly, I think, because he's got (understandable) beef with the way KDE and GNOME use a huge load of very small files, and the way a lot applications use fsync() instead of fdatasync().

Generally, I'd advise against ext4 for a production system just yet.
Sponsored Links
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gfs2 vs xfs vs ext4 king_hippo Filesystems, Disks and Memory 12 11-30-2009 04:00 PM
LUN not ready sbn Solaris 1 01-26-2009 02:20 AM
LyX 1.6 is ready for release Linux Bot UNIX and Linux RSS News 0 08-28-2008 11:10 AM
Fedora Commons: NOW AVAILABLE: Production-Ready Fedora 3.0 Fits With the Web Linux Bot Software Releases - RSS News 0 07-31-2008 12:30 AM
Anonymous Voting System: ready to download Linux Bot Software Releases - RSS News 0 07-10-2008 12:10 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 PM.