|
google site
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Blog | Man Pages | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Users | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Filesystems, Disks and Memory Discuss NAS, SAN, RAID, Robotic Libraries, backup devices, RAM, DRAM, SCSI, IDE, EIDE topics here. |
![]() |
|
|
Search this Thread |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
ext4 - ready for production system?
Gidday,
Are you using ext4 for production system? Or is it better to opt for a more conservative strategy, like ext3 for instance? What are your experiences? Thanks in advance, Loïc. |
| Sponsored Links | ||
|
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
For production, always opt for the conservative strategy.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Cheers, Loïc. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
The only major distribution that I know has already adopted ext4 is Ubuntu. And what I've been following on various reports on it, Theodor Tso is still adding and modifying features ,mostly, I think, because he's got (understandable) beef with the way KDE and GNOME use a huge load of very small files, and the way a lot applications use fsync() instead of fdatasync().
Generally, I'd advise against ext4 for a production system just yet. |
| Sponsored Links | ||
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Gfs2 vs xfs vs ext4 | king_hippo | Filesystems, Disks and Memory | 12 | 11-30-2009 04:00 PM |
| LUN not ready | sbn | Solaris | 1 | 01-26-2009 02:20 AM |
| LyX 1.6 is ready for release | Linux Bot | UNIX and Linux RSS News | 0 | 08-28-2008 11:10 AM |
| Fedora Commons: NOW AVAILABLE: Production-Ready Fedora 3.0 Fits With the Web | Linux Bot | Software Releases - RSS News | 0 | 07-31-2008 12:30 AM |
| Anonymous Voting System: ready to download | Linux Bot | Software Releases - RSS News | 0 | 07-10-2008 12:10 AM |