![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Filesystems, Disks and Memory Discuss NAS, SAN, RAID, Robotic Libraries, backup devices, RAM, DRAM, SCSI, IDE, EIDE topics here. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Redhat nfs client hangs after 5 minutes | hpg4815 | Red Hat | 9 | 09-08-2009 04:23 PM |
| Using Redhat VIA SSH client. | blind melon | Red Hat | 0 | 01-28-2009 05:57 PM |
| Benchmarking NFSv3 vs. NFSv4 file operation performance | iBot | UNIX and Linux RSS News | 0 | 06-20-2008 04:20 AM |
| Getting NFSv4 prompt when installing bootable DVD | declanryan | SUN Solaris | 0 | 03-03-2008 10:55 AM |
| How to configure a Redhat 9.0 as NIS+ client | alexhon | Red Hat | 3 | 04-20-2005 08:09 AM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
||||
|
NFSv4 on Netapp and Redhat 5.3 as Client
Hi Folks!
I'm new in using NFSv4 and do have a little trouble. I had a partition working with NFSv3, at the beginning i couldn't see on the client the German umlauts letters {ö,ä,ü} a manipulation of the LANG environment variable helped and the filenames with this letters were shown normally (before the letter was replaced by an "?"). That all worked fine until we wanted to use NFSv4. The problem with the umlauts is back again. But this time it is not a "?" by that they are replaced. Every umlaut is replaced by "~#seq.Nr" and the rest of the word is cut of. I have read that the Server and the Client hve to use the same charset, so we changed the charset on the NetApp to de_DE.UTF-8 and the Redhat to LANG=de.UTF-8. Unfortunately it didn't changed anything. I am very thanfull for all your helps, that i can read my regular filenames again without this replacements und cut-off. I tried several hours to find a good solution, e.g. I'm not really interessted in renaming the whole system tree. Because it would be a lot of lines to manipulate. Kind Regards and Thank you for your help Oku |
|
||||
|
Well a good reason is to try it out, test it benchmark it. I've read it has a better performance but I'm not a person who just believes, I want to ratify that. What performance is better, throughput or also finding files etc. But therefore it is need to work.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| nfs4. netapp, redhat 5.3 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|