The UNIX and Linux Forums  
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Special Forums > Filesystems, Disks and Memory
Installed memory ≠ usable size? Installed memory ≠ usable size?
.
google unix.com

Forums Register Forum RulesLinksAlbums FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Filesystems, Disks and Memory Discuss NAS, SAN, RAID, Robotic Libraries, backups, RAM, DRAM, SCSI, IDE, EIDE topics here.

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IPMI - Get physical memory size sncr24 IP Networking 0 05-18-2009 09:59 AM
Command to check memory size nano2 SUN Solaris 0 06-22-2007 06:56 AM
memory size under AIX big123456 UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users 3 08-08-2006 09:57 AM
Size of Installed RAM ? RamblasPro UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 2 11-14-2003 12:00 PM
How to get amount of memory installed. elgholm UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 4 08-24-2001 07:04 AM

Reply
Page 1 of 4 1 234 >
English Japanese Spanish French German Portuguese Italian Dutch Swedish Russian Norwegian Hungarian Hebrew Danish
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2009
CRGreathouse CRGreathouse is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 101
Installed memory ≠ usable size?
I was configuring my BIOS after installing 2 GB of RAM, and I saw this:
Code:
System memory
Installed size : 4096MB
Usable size    : 3584MB
I have a 64-bit OS (Ubuntu 9.04 64-bit), so does that mean the motherboard (ASUS M3A78-T) doesn't support more than 4 GB of addressing?
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2009
otheus's Avatar
otheus otheus is offline Forum Staff  
Moderator ala Mode
  
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Innsbruck, Austria
Posts: 1,864
You installed 2 GB and you're wondering if "only" 4 is supported? Strange question.

Are you concerned about the "usable size"? This is most likely video RAM and the space allocated by the BIOS.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2009
wirelessworlds wirelessworlds is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin Texas, USA
Posts: 1
Cool if it was me ....
If it was me, I would grab a linux distro that has a memory checker like knoppix.net . Next run a memory test. This will give you the allot better idea on the status of the RAM. Most MB only support X many gig, and have flash upgrades. I highly recommend having someone who knows what they are doing to do most motherboard flashes. Seen my share of DOA boards from flashes that went wrong.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2009
CRGreathouse CRGreathouse is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by otheus View Post
You installed 2 GB and you're wondering if "only" 4 is supported? Strange question.
I had 2 GB installed and I was installing 2 GB more. Only 3.5 showed up, which should not be the case if the computer is using "64-bit" (actually usually just 48-bit?) addressing.
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-06-2009
otheus's Avatar
otheus otheus is offline Forum Staff  
Moderator ala Mode
  
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Innsbruck, Austria
Posts: 1,864
If you install a 32-bit with PAE kernel, you'll be able to see all the memory also.

No, I think the problem is the video ram.
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-06-2009
CRGreathouse CRGreathouse is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by otheus View Post
No, I think the problem is the video ram.
If I can only address 32 bits, then clearly the 512 MB loss is for the video RAM. But if I could address 48 bits, that wouldn't be a problem. Right?

Or am I missing something?
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009
otheus's Avatar
otheus otheus is offline Forum Staff  
Moderator ala Mode
  
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Innsbruck, Austria
Posts: 1,864
Quote:
But if I could address 48 bits, that wouldn't be a problem. Right?
You have only 4 GB of RAM installed. You can't get more RAM than what you have installed. If the OS sees 3.5 GB, it correctly sees how much is physically available to it.

A single process will have only 2 GB available to it unless you install some kernel patches which move the shared-memory boundary. On the other hand, if you use shared memory (for postgres, oracle, maybe mysql, large virtual ram disk), you can utilize all of the memory currently in your system.

If you want to expand another gigabyte or so, you'll need PAE or a 64-bit OS.
Sponsored Links
Reply
Page 1 of 4 1 234 >

Bookmarks

« SAN Disk w/o Cluster | How to create mondo backup for size > 4.5 GB »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:10 PM.

The UNIX and Linux Forums - Learn UNIX and UNIX Commands RSS Feeds - Contact Us - The UNIX and Linux Forums - Learn UNIX and UNIX Commands - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Language translation by Google.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2009. All Rights Reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0