![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Filesystems, Disks and Memory Discuss NAS, SAN, RAID, Robotic Libraries, backup devices, RAM, DRAM, SCSI, IDE, EIDE topics here. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| buffer cache size | gsr_kashyap | Red Hat | 0 | 09-07-2006 01:34 AM |
| Unix Cache / Buffer | jimthompson | SUN Solaris | 1 | 10-26-2005 10:03 AM |
| Buffer Cache | ALTRUNVRSOFLN | HP-UX | 1 | 04-02-2005 09:43 PM |
| vm and buffer cache | vish_shan | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 2 | 04-29-2002 07:15 AM |
| buffer cache information | vish_shan | Filesystems, Disks and Memory | 2 | 04-15-2002 03:19 AM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Buffer Cache Stats from /proc/meminfo
Hi,
I am trying to understand the role of buffer cache in block I/O. I am monitoring /proc/meminfo, my question is does the value of 0 for 'buffers', mean that any subsequent disk read issued by a process, would get the data physically from the disk, and not an allocated buffer for the block? [Since, I can see the value of buffer parameter is currently 0?????] Could someone elaborate on what does buffer=0 actually mean? |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|