![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Filesystems, Disks and Memory Discuss NAS, SAN, RAID, Robotic Libraries, backup devices, RAM, DRAM, SCSI, IDE, EIDE topics here. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| fdisk -l doesn't see one 2540 array, can see other arrays though | buddhavelvet | SUN Solaris | 6 | 10-23-2008 09:23 AM |
| One StorageTek 6140 vs Two (2) 2540 's? | buddhavelvet | SUN Solaris | 12 | 10-21-2008 05:50 AM |
| Using RAID 6 on the Sun StorageTek 6140 Array | iBot | Solaris BigAdmin RSS | 0 | 10-14-2008 09:20 PM |
| Sun Sparc T2000 + StorageTek 2540 - Help, I'm lost | soliberus | SUN Solaris | 4 | 10-10-2008 09:50 AM |
| Fiber Channel StorageTek Array Visible to OS | photon | SUN Solaris | 3 | 10-01-2008 01:07 PM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
||||
|
Configure large volume on Sun StorageTek 2540 array
Hi,
We have 12x1TB SATA disks in our array and I need to create 10TB volume. I defined new storage profile on array and when I tried to add volume, I faced with ~2TB limit for new volumes. I didn't find how to set another limit on my storage profile. Is there is a way to configure one large volume or I need to configure 10x1TB volumes?. |
|
||||
|
Just upgraded my 2540 to 1tb drives as well
You can remove the 2tb volume limit by flashing newer firmware on the 2540. On my array, I upgraded from 6.x.x to 7.35.10.10 and am now able to create 8tb volumes (I don't have enough 1tb disks for a 10tb volume, so I can't test that particular volume size for you). One thing to note, the 7.35.10.10 firmware has a bug with array cache display. This will result in the array appearing to not have any cache although it does and it is definitely using it as I've benchmarked my array both before and after the firmware update. The other issue that arises from this bug is that you will not be able to see the cache utilization on the array. Sun is aware of the cache bug and is actively working on a fix for it.
|
|
||||
|
dbell37
Thanks a lot for your answer. Actually, I've already solved this problem - I discussed it on Sun forums and I was told to update firmware, but when performing this procedure I faced with some errors... Anyway, thanks for answer ![]() |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|