![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Filesystems, Disks and Memory Discuss NAS, SAN, RAID, Robotic Libraries, backup devices, RAM, DRAM, SCSI, IDE, EIDE topics here. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Announcing collectl - new performance linux performance monitor | MarkSeger | News, Links, Events and Announcements | 0 | 10-26-2007 06:14 PM |
| I/O performance | gfhgfnhhn | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 2 | 09-10-2006 01:10 PM |
| performance | big123456 | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 2 | 09-05-2006 12:39 PM |
| AIX performance | chlawren | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 6 | 04-27-2006 12:06 PM |
| Performance of rsh | jhansrod | Shell Programming and Scripting | 1 | 06-14-2005 02:29 AM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
||||
|
HBA performance
Hope I'm in the right place. I'm in the process of zoning HBA's to my new library environment. Is there a "rule of thumb" for the number of physical tape drives that you zone to an HBA? I don't want to run the risk of overloading an HBA. Any information would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|