![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Forums | Portal | Register | Rules & FAQ | Contribute | Members List | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Email Antispam Techniques and Email Filtering Techniques Q&A and Procmail recipes for fighting spam. |
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Checking the time of last file received? | rebootman | Shell Programming and Scripting | 9 | 05-30-2008 08:57 AM |
| Received all post on my mail addess | yogesh goyal | Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators | 0 | 08-05-2006 02:10 AM |
| Did not received any email for account activation | bhush782003 | Forum Support Area for Unregistered Users & Account Problems | 0 | 06-05-2006 01:58 PM |
| SIGHUP received to pppd | jaguar | Linux | 2 | 08-05-2004 04:38 AM |
| Correctly received bytes? | mint1981 | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 2 | 09-13-2002 01:49 AM |
|
|
Submit Tools | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
* ^(Received):.*(66.55.160\.|66.55.161\.)
Can you suggest a way of rewriting rule below that would ensure that the class C "66.55.160" is blocked but "166.55.160.*" would
pass? :0 * ^(Received):.*(66.55.160\.|66.55.161\.|66.55.162\.|66.55.163\.|66.55.164\.|66.55.165\.|66.55.166\.|6 6.55.167\ .) { LOG="(ISKIMARO vendare 1) " :0 /dev/null } [begs the obvious] At least until I can verify no false SPAM positives, I need more logging than /etc/mail/access 66.55.160 DISCARD When the filter does get rotated into /etc/mail/access, I prefer not to use a REJECT, because I don't want to give any feedback to SPAMMERS which would tend to alert them to mail me from one of their other servers. |
|||
| Google UNIX.COM |
| Forum Sponsor | ||
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|