![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Complex Event Processing RSS News Aggregated RSS news on CEP, ESP and EP. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DEBS08(2) - Overloaded Agents | iBot | Complex Event Processing RSS News | 0 | 07-04-2008 12:10 AM |
| DataComplex Inc. Releases the First Web Based Event Processing Solution | iBot | Complex Event Processing RSS News | 0 | 03-08-2008 01:10 AM |
| Ubuntu's Upstart event-based init daemon | iBot | UNIX and Linux RSS News | 0 | 02-08-2008 05:40 AM |
| GZIP memory constraints | Parmod Garg | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 0 | 06-26-2007 01:59 AM |
| About template constraints | sarwan | High Level Programming | 0 | 11-21-2005 04:11 AM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||||
|
DEBS08(5) - Event-based Constraints
vincent
Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:41:24 +0000 Another paper at the Distributed Event Based Systems conference was on “Event Based Constraints for SensorNet Programming”. I had high hopes for an interesting paper on goal-driven CEP, but in fact the authors (from Brown University, USA) seemed to define “constraint” as a synonym of “filter” (as in “temporal, spatial, attribute-based or existential constraints on some event”). So there was no CLP-type relaxing of constraints during event processing to try and achieve some goal. The paper did describe some an interesting approach to distributed CEP, using spatial and temporal event processing elements to divide up a high-datarate environment (detecting people being chased in a crowd). The main problem was, as always in distributed event processing (without a shared memory bus), ensuring that all possible event correlations can take place (with the right event being in the right processor at the right time). Probably for some sensor processing, though, a 100% success rate is not a requirement (i.e. if someone runs across an “event process boundary”, they will be presumably be picked up by the next event processor at some point). Source... |
| Sponsored Links | ||
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|