The UNIX and Linux Forums  

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Operating Systems > AIX
.
google unix.com



AIX AIX is IBM's industry-leading UNIX operating system that meets the demands of applications that businesses rely upon in today's marketplace.

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unix Rbac JPoroo UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 4 09-17-2008 08:09 AM
Automating RBAC with IF/Then statement deaconf19 Shell Programming and Scripting 0 11-15-2007 03:20 AM
RBAC Help deaconf19 SUN Solaris 4 11-14-2007 04:59 AM
Rbac chrisdberry SUN Solaris 0 02-27-2007 05:47 AM
RBAC logging geomonap UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users 0 02-15-2006 04:27 PM

Closed Thread
English Japanese Spanish French German Portuguese Italian Dutch Swedish Russian Norwegian Hungarian Hebrew Danish Bulgarian Greek Powered by Powered by Google
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-06-2008
dgaixsysadm dgaixsysadm is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10
RBAC in 5.3 Question

I would like to use the Role Based access control to granulize some of the administration of AIX systems in our organization. Across the company we will be using aix 5.3. One of these roles will only have the access to make, change and delete users, something similar to ManageAllUsers. The thing that I dont understand about RBAC in aix 5.3 is that in order to make this work, I have to assign both the secuity group and the role to the user, lets call him ‘groucho’. My big question is, if I add groucho to the security group, he will be able to run the mkuser, rmuser, and chuser commands with or without the ManageAllUsers (or ManageBasicUsers) Role. So my question is what good is the Role at all? If I add the proper group membership, it not only gives access to run these commands, but possibly even some commands that I don’t want authorized.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-09-2008
dgaixsysadm dgaixsysadm is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10
Perhaps if I elaborate a little bit. I have user one 'groucho' and a second user 'karl' . I want groucho to be a user admin, with the ability to create, change, and delete user accounts. I assign him the role of ManageAllUsers and the required security group. I want Karl to be able to manage Roles, I assign Karl the ManageRoles group and the security group. I do not want groucho to be able to change, create, or delete roles. However, once I've given the group membership to groucho the command
$smit mkrole
allows me to run no problem (when Ideally he would only be able to administer user type commands)
consequently, if i run
$smit user
from Karl's account, I can also create and delete users. Neither of these Roles give any kind of benefit if they are not coupled with the secondary group membership 'security', however it seems that if I remove the roles from both users, and simply leave the security group in place, they have the same access permissions... No more, No less. Is this the way that RBAC is supposed to work in aix 5.3? I have read quite a bit about the features of ERBAC in 6.1 and I'm wondering if that is the only way to achieve the amount of granularity that I require.

Can someone offer any insights?
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:55 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Language Translations Powered by .
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2009. All Rights Reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0