![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| AIX AIX is IBM's industry-leading UNIX operating system that meets the demands of applications that businesses rely upon in today's marketplace. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Motion: Higher performance graphics mode may remain active if Compressor is used to t | iBot | OS X Support RSS | 0 | 11-05-2008 01:10 AM |
| active working | battaglia | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 5 | 06-05-2008 06:31 AM |
| Active / Non Active users ? | varungupta | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 3 | 05-11-2008 11:00 PM |
| Switching the active pts? | tspicher | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 4 | 06-25-2007 07:52 PM |
| active machine | Raom | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 0 | 10-21-2005 01:10 AM |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Question about HACMP for active-active mode
Hi all,
I am new to HACMP. So sorry for the newie question. But I did search the forum and it seems that no one asks this before. So if a 2-node cluster runs in active-active mode (and the same application), what is the benefit of using HACMP ? If it runs in active-stanby, it is easy to understand because you need HACMP to do failover; but for active-active mode, no failover (right ?), then why do we need HACMP ? Besides, I find HACMP documents do not use the term "active-active" or "active-standby" (cold standby or hot standby) often. So does "concurrent resource group" mean "active-active" and "cascading/rotating resource group" mean "active-standby" ? Is there a cold standby ? And what is the relation between "concurrent resource group" and "concurrent shared disk access"; what's the relation between "Cascading/Rotating resource group" and "non-concurrent shared disk access" ? Thanks! Last edited by qiulang; 4 Weeks Ago at 08:18 AM.. |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|