The UNIX and Linux Forums  
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Operating Systems > AIX
.
google unix.com



AIX AIX is IBM's industry-leading UNIX operating system that meets the demands of applications that businesses rely upon in today's marketplace.

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Strange Mysql issue muay_tb Web Programming, Web 2.0 and Mashups 1 04-27-2009 07:05 AM
strange issue with ALOM in t51... upengan78 SUN Solaris 13 02-23-2009 11:42 AM
S-244: Cisco IOS User Datagram Protocol Delivery Issue for IPv4/IPv6 Dual-Stack Route iBot Security Advisories (RSS) 0 03-27-2008 04:40 PM
Strange issue AndrewSH UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 1 01-29-2008 05:33 PM
root Password ... strange issue badrali Security 6 06-28-2007 09:41 AM

Reply
English Japanese Spanish French German Portuguese Italian Dutch Swedish Russian Norwegian Hungarian Hebrew Danish
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2009
rs6000er rs6000er is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3
strange route issue in powerha 5.4?

hi all



we upgraded hacmp(powerha) from 5.2 to 5.4 recently .



during the failover testing, we found a strange network issue. after standby node took service ip address (172.15.100.8) online at standby NIC, we were able to log in the standby node by telnet 172.15.100.8 which stays at standby node standyb NIC.



when we tried to run ping or traceroute to a ip address outside of of our network, for example google.com or ibm.com, the NIC that holds service ip address were not able to send any packet out at all.



instead, the primay NIC that holds boot address of standby node (172.15.103.79) will take in place and send the ping packet out or traceroute to out side of world.



on the other hand, any testing within our intranet acted normal. we checked dns server and routing table of standby node and gateway setup, they were all good.



the follwoing info is the routing configuration from standby node.



Routing tables
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use If Exp Groups

Route Tree for Protocol Family 2 (Internet):
default 172.15.100.150 UG 1 28215 en4 - -
127/8 127.0.0.1 U 9 921983 lo0 - -
172.15.100.0 172.15.103.79 UHSb 0 0 en4 - - =>
172.15.100/22 172.15.103.79 U 6 4212671 en4 - -
172.15.103.79 127.0.0.1 UGHS 0 671937 lo0 - -
172.15.103.255 172.15.103.79 UHSb 0 288 en4 - -
172.16.60.0 172.16.60.60 UHSb 0 0 en5 - - =>
172.16.60/22 172.16.60.60 U 2 2712283 en5 - -
172.16.60.60 127.0.0.1 UGHS 0 382645 lo0 - -
172.16.63.255 172.16.60.60 UHSb 0 1 en5 - -

Route Tree for Protocol Family 24 (Internet v6):
::1 ::1 UH 0 236 lo0 - -


as you may see, the default routing is set up for en4 (the primay NIC that holds boot ip address). is it possible that we manally set up a route entry to let en5 ( the standby NIC that will holds the service ip address when failover) go out side as well like this?



Routing tables
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use If Exp Groups

Route Tree for Protocol Family 2 (Internet):
default 172.15.100.150 UG 1 28217 en4 - -
127/8 127.0.0.1 U 10 922176 lo0 - -
172.15.100.0 172.15.103.79 UHSb 0 0 en4 - - =>
172.15.100/22 172.15.103.79 U 6 4213902 en4 - - =>
172.15.100/22 172.15.100.8 UG 0 6 en5 - -
172.15.103.79 127.0.0.1 UGHS 0 672133 lo0 - -
172.15.103.255 172.15.103.79 UHSb 0 288 en4 - -
172.16.60.0 172.16.60.60 UHSb 0 0 en5 - - =>
172.16.60/22 172.16.60.60 U 2 2712830 en5 - -
172.16.60.60 127.0.0.1 UGHS 0 382726 lo0 - -
172.16.63.255 172.16.60.60 UHSb 0 1 en5 - -

Route Tree for Protocol Family 24 (Internet v6):
::1 ::1 UH 0 236 lo0 - -
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2009
shockneck's Avatar
shockneck shockneck is offline Forum Advisor  
No RISC - No Fun
  
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Infractor's boudoir
Posts: 352
The problem is not related to the HACMP release but to the fact that you set the default route for an aliased network at boottime when HACMP is not yet active. To get around that routing problem you could set the routes from the Application Server or you could configure Persistant IP Labels of the same net as the Service Label on the cluster nodes. In the second case choose Collocate with Persistant IP as policy to avoid follow up routing problems.
Sponsored Links
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:08 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Language translation by Google.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2009. All Rights Reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0