|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Forums | Portal | Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Contribute | Members List | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Security Anything involving computer security goes here. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ftp to firewall | vtran4270 | Linux | 0 | 01-30-2004 05:20 PM |
| Looking Out from Behind a Firewall | mntamago | Security | 4 | 07-17-2003 05:39 AM |
| What Firewall do you use? | tarballed | Security | 5 | 08-07-2002 09:17 PM |
| firewall vs. closing ports | adam_crosby | Security | 7 | 02-24-2002 01:26 PM |
| BSD Firewall | deadletter | IP Networking | 3 | 01-06-2002 07:04 AM |
 |
|
|
Submit Tools | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
09-14-2005
|
|||
|
|||
|
Firewall Ports
Could someone please settle an inter-office argument? Will your network traffic be slower through a firewall on any other port other than port 80. In other words, is port 80 faster than any other port you open on the firewall. I say no. Thanks in advance for the help!
|
| Forum Sponsor | ||
|
|
|
#2
09-14-2005
|
||||
|
||||
 i would say no, with no additional features a firewall should only act as a "router". if you have some features like intrusion detection, Application-layer security, VPN so&so&so&so, it could be slower than a "normal" router, but to be honest, i cannot believe that in that situation port 80 is faster than another one.... gP
|
|
#3
09-14-2005
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the help. You answered my question and won me a bottle of bourbon. Thanks!
|
|||
| Google The UNIX and Linux Forums |
Linear Mode
