Sponsored Content
Operating Systems Linux Slackware Anyone Using Slackware Anymore? Post 302877410 by Scott on Saturday 30th of November 2013 11:56:53 PM
Old 12-01-2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by gitac
yes i like slackware, i use work with science and programmation,..slackware solved all my work!!!
Slackware is my favourite, i programm much in C,...
i pretend use other OS's in the future, but continue with Slacware!!!!

i love slackware!

---------- Post updated at 11:39 PM ---------- Previous update was at 11:34 PM ----------

i use ubuntu, bactrack,,..too,...but far i prefer Slackware!!!
i want play gentoo, BSD and IBM yet in the future!!!

but i am a Slackwarian!!!
be eternal Slackware!!!
Unless I'm mistaken, I think you like Slackware?

The last time I used Slackware, it came on four 3.5" floppy disks and was a text-based manual installation. It actually felt good, like I knew what I was doing. These days when I install Red Hat, it's a case of adding a VM in VMWare, a couple of DNS entries, starting it up, and the next time I see it, there's a login prompt. Brilliant for efficiency, but not nearly as exciting!
 

8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Slackware

After installing linux cannot boot PC anymore?

After installing linux (slackware) my (experimental) computer can't boot anymore. When I start the pc it says: "There was an error during linux startup" (or something like that, it was written in my language and I'm a bad translator) And after that my computer doesn't do a thing anymore. I... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: RellioN
4 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Can't login as SU anymore - SU: NO SHELL

the root shell has been changed in the file /etc/passwd, basically pointing to an incorrect directory. So now every time we login as 'su' I get the message 'su: no shell' so we can't login as superuser. Is there an easy way to rectify this? please use step by step instructions/commands - I... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: homechoice
4 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

connection doesn't work anymore

Hello, first of all, I want to make myself clear about my language. I'm brazilian, so I ask you all to understand if i commit any mistake with the grammar. Here is the problem. Some days ago I needed to use a "sh" command in the Terminal (I use a Mac OSX 10.5.6) followed by a file... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: anubisbr
0 Replies

4. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Can't SSH as root anymore!

I've screwed something up in my sshd_config apparently, because I can't ssh with root anymore. I had disabled root login for security reasons, but then my ssh credentials with full administrative privelges stopped working. So then I reenabled root login (and reset ssh), but root now isn't... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: cquarry
3 Replies

5. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Input of char 's' is not possible anymore

Hello, I have a big problem and no idea how to solve it. I was looking up commands in /bin with 'man' as I found 'sh'. In mistake I started the command. Now after that I can not input the character 's' in shell anymore! Even after restarting system the problem is still there. Mysterious... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: daWonderer
7 Replies

6. Windows & DOS: Issues & Discussions

Can't login to Vista anymore

hello obviously something got messed up and I can't login to my Vista account anymore. the password was automatically disabled hence it was directly booting into vista. then I installed openSSH and created a password for the user. But vista login doesn't recognize this password and now I can't... (6 Replies)
Discussion started by: milhan
6 Replies

7. Solaris

Telnet access is not available anymore

Hi Folks, My telnet access to the server is not available anymore. I have found that when I execute >telnet IP, the login prompt for username/password entry is not displayed. Cursor blinks in a empty line and I dont see the prompt to enter my username. It hungs in this state and not possible... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: ekorgur
1 Replies

8. What is on Your Mind?

They won't need so many sys admins anymore

Nice eye catching title huh ;) I got laid off along with 55000 others from HP worldwide have been expecting this for some time and now it's finally my turn. Most of the folks I know get laid off at around this age of 40+ so do take note. Ideas that ran thru my head this last few weeks:... (16 Replies)
Discussion started by: sparcguy
16 Replies
epm(1)							      Easy Software Products							    epm(1)

NAME
epm - create software packages. SYNOPSIS
epm [ -a architecture ] [ -f format ] [ -g ] [ -k ] [ -m name ] [ -n[mrs] ] [ -s setup.xpm ] [ --depend ] [ --help ] [ --keep-files ] [ --output-dir directory ] [ --setup-image setup.xpm ] [ --setup-program /foo/bar/setup ] [ --setup-types setup.types ] [ -v ] [ name=value ... name=value ] product [ listfile ] DESCRIPTION
epm generates software packages complete with installation, removal, and (if necessary) patch scripts. Unless otherwise specified, the files required for product are read from a file named "product.list". The -a option ("architecture") specifies the actual architecture for the software. Without this option the generic processor architecture is used ("intel", "sparc", "mips", etc.) The -f option ("format") specifies the distribution format: aix Generate an AIX distribution suitable for installation on an AIX system. bsd Generate a BSD distribution suitable for installation on a FreeBSD, NetBSD, or OpenBSD system. deb Generate a Debian distribution suitable for installation on a Debian Linux system. inst, tardist Generate an IRIX distribution suitable for installation on an system running IRIX. lsb, lsb-signed Generate RPM packages for LSB-conforming systems. The lsb-signed format uses the GPG private key you have defined in the ~/.rpmmacros file. native Generate an native distribution. This uses rpm for Linux, inst for IRIX, pkg for Solaris, swinstall for HP-UX, bsd for FreeBSD, Net- BSD, and OpenBSD, and osx for MacOS X. All other operating systems default to the portable format. osx Generate a MacOS X software package. pkg Generate an AT&T software package. These are used primarily under Solaris. portable Generate a portable distribution based on shell scripts and tar files. The resulting distribution is installed and removed the same way on all operating systems. [default] rpm, rpm-signed Generate a Red Hat Package Manager ("RPM") distribution suitable for installation on a Red Hat Linux system. The rpm-signed format uses the GPG private key you have defined in the ~/.rpmmacros file. setld Generate a Tru64 (setld) software distribution. slackware Generate a Slackware Linux software distribution. swinstall, depot Generate a HP-UX software distribution. Executable files in the distribution are normally stripped of debugging information when packaged. To disable this functionality use the -g option. Intermediate (spec, etc.) files used to create the distribution are normally removed after the distribution is created. The -k option keeps these files in the distribution directory. The -s and --setup-image options ("setup") include the ESP Software Wizard with the specified GIF or XPM image file with the distribution. This option is currently only supported by portable and RPM distributions. The --setup-program option specifies the setup executable to use with the distribution. This option is currently only supported by portable distributions. The --setup-types option specifies the setup.types file to include with the distribution. This option is currently only supported by porta- ble distributions. The --output-dir option specifies the directory to place output file into. The default directory is based on the operating system, version, and architecture. The -v option ("verbose") increases the amount of information that is reported. Use multiple v's for more verbose output. The --depend option lists the dependent (source) files for all files in the package. Distributions normally are named "product-version-system-release-machine.ext" and "product-version-system-release-machine-patch.ext" (for patch distributions.) The "system-release-machine" information can be customized or eliminated using the -n option with the appropriate trailing letters. Using -n by itself will remove the "system-release-machine" string from the filename entirely. The "system-release- machine" information can also be customized by using the -m option with an arbitrary string. Debian, IRIX, portable, and Red Hat distributions use the extensions ".deb", ".tardist", "tar.gz", and ".rpm" respectively. LIST FILES
The EPM list file format is now described in the epm.list(5) man page. KNOWN BUGS
EPM does not currently support generation of IRIX software patches. SEE ALSO
epminstall(1) - add a directory, file, or symlink to a list file mkepmlist(1) - make an epm list file from a directory epm.list(5) - epm list file format setup(1) - graphical setup program for the esp package manager COPYRIGHT
Copyright 1999-2008 by Easy Software Products, All Rights Reserved. This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MER- CHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. 26 August 2008 ESP Package Manager epm(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43 AM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy