Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: RAM check
Operating Systems Solaris RAM check Post 302776323 by DustinT on Wednesday 6th of March 2013 07:03:57 AM
Old 03-06-2013
The normal diagnostics are pretty good, if you want to you can run an extended diagnostics upon boot which is even more thorough. The normal diags take maybe 10 minutes to run and the extended will be around an hour. Well, at least that's on my servers, yours may have more or less equipment and the times will change accordingly.

You may also wish to review the FreeBSD for Sparc page which may allow you another testing environment.
This User Gave Thanks to DustinT For This Post:
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Total ram

Hi How can i find the total ram in the system? :confused: (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: orca
4 Replies

2. HP-UX

Ram structure

Hi all, I would like know if we can enter a command under UNIX (HPUX 10.xx) to know the hard ram memory structure . Thanks Dorian (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Dorian
1 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

RAM Drive

I need to have fast access to some of my files (like 5 Gb). Im on: Linux franklin3 2.4.21-4.EL #1 Fri Oct 3 18:13:58 EDT 2003 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux How can I load my files in my RAM ? Thank you in advance! (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Gab
0 Replies

4. Solaris

getting available physical RAM

What command should I be using on Solaris 9 to get an accurate representation of the available physical RAM? (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: dangral
4 Replies

5. AIX

Know RAM and CPU

Dear How i can know the ( RAM and CPU ) on unix. we use AIX operating system. This is for security purposes. (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: abu_hassan
10 Replies

6. Red Hat

red hat Linux 5.0 is detecting 3gb ram but physical ram is 16gb

Hi, On server 64bit Hw Arch , Linux 5.0(32bit) is installed it is showing only 3gb of ram though physical is 16gb can u give me idea why? (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: manoj.solaris
4 Replies

7. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Command to check RAM usage

Hi Guys, How can i check the RAM usage for a particular user on the Linux machine. What command can be used. Thanks in advance, Swapna (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Swapna173
1 Replies

8. Hardware

skip RAM check?

is there a way to skip RAM check on sparc boot before the ok prompt? (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: orange47
2 Replies

9. Red Hat

Need to check full utilization of my pc RAM - any commands ???

hi guys, I wanted to utilize my PC's full RAM memory to check its performance, for that how can i perform this full RAM utilization with the help of a process or a command in rhel 6. for example, in windows, while checking the harddisk for error (chkdsk - command ) could takes full RAM... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: redhatlbug
7 Replies

10. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Want to update the RAM

hi, i m working on my ubuntu 12.10 i wanted to update my desktop's RAM. so kindly let me know how i get below details (thru commands in terminal) 1) what is the processor am using currently 2) what is the RAM am using currently 3) max how much i can upgrade my RAM (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: anandpasunoori
4 Replies
SPLAIN(1)						 Perl Programmers Reference Guide						 SPLAIN(1)

NAME
diagnostics, splain - produce verbose warning diagnostics SYNOPSIS
Using the "diagnostics" pragma: use diagnostics; use diagnostics -verbose; enable diagnostics; disable diagnostics; Using the "splain" standalone filter program: perl program 2>diag.out splain [-v] [-p] diag.out Using diagnostics to get stack traces from a misbehaving script: perl -Mdiagnostics=-traceonly my_script.pl DESCRIPTION
The "diagnostics" Pragma This module extends the terse diagnostics normally emitted by both the perl compiler and the perl interpreter (from running perl with a -w switch or "use warnings"), augmenting them with the more explicative and endearing descriptions found in perldiag. Like the other pragmata, it affects the compilation phase of your program rather than merely the execution phase. To use in your program as a pragma, merely invoke use diagnostics; at the start (or near the start) of your program. (Note that this does enable perl's -w flag.) Your whole compilation will then be subject(ed :-) to the enhanced diagnostics. These still go out STDERR. Due to the interaction between runtime and compiletime issues, and because it's probably not a very good idea anyway, you may not use "no diagnostics" to turn them off at compiletime. However, you may control their behaviour at runtime using the disable() and enable() methods to turn them off and on respectively. The -verbose flag first prints out the perldiag introduction before any other diagnostics. The $diagnostics::PRETTY variable can generate nicer escape sequences for pagers. Warnings dispatched from perl itself (or more accurately, those that match descriptions found in perldiag) are only displayed once (no duplicate descriptions). User code generated warnings a la warn() are unaffected, allowing duplicate user messages to be displayed. This module also adds a stack trace to the error message when perl dies. This is useful for pinpointing what caused the death. The -traceonly (or just -t) flag turns off the explanations of warning messages leaving just the stack traces. So if your script is dieing, run it again with perl -Mdiagnostics=-traceonly my_bad_script to see the call stack at the time of death. By supplying the -warntrace (or just -w) flag, any warnings emitted will also come with a stack trace. The splain Program While apparently a whole nuther program, splain is actually nothing more than a link to the (executable) diagnostics.pm module, as well as a link to the diagnostics.pod documentation. The -v flag is like the "use diagnostics -verbose" directive. The -p flag is like the $diagnostics::PRETTY variable. Since you're post-processing with splain, there's no sense in being able to enable() or disable() processing. Output from splain is directed to STDOUT, unlike the pragma. EXAMPLES
The following file is certain to trigger a few errors at both runtime and compiletime: use diagnostics; print NOWHERE "nothing "; print STDERR " This message should be unadorned. "; warn " This is a user warning"; print " DIAGNOSTIC TESTER: Please enter a <CR> here: "; my $a, $b = scalar <STDIN>; print " "; print $x/$y; If you prefer to run your program first and look at its problem afterwards, do this: perl -w test.pl 2>test.out ./splain < test.out Note that this is not in general possible in shells of more dubious heritage, as the theoretical (perl -w test.pl >/dev/tty) >& test.out ./splain < test.out Because you just moved the existing stdout to somewhere else. If you don't want to modify your source code, but still have on-the-fly warnings, do this: exec 3>&1; perl -w test.pl 2>&1 1>&3 3>&- | splain 1>&2 3>&- Nifty, eh? If you want to control warnings on the fly, do something like this. Make sure you do the "use" first, or you won't be able to get at the enable() or disable() methods. use diagnostics; # checks entire compilation phase print " time for 1st bogus diags: SQUAWKINGS "; print BOGUS1 'nada'; print "done with 1st bogus "; disable diagnostics; # only turns off runtime warnings print " time for 2nd bogus: (squelched) "; print BOGUS2 'nada'; print "done with 2nd bogus "; enable diagnostics; # turns back on runtime warnings print " time for 3rd bogus: SQUAWKINGS "; print BOGUS3 'nada'; print "done with 3rd bogus "; disable diagnostics; print " time for 4th bogus: (squelched) "; print BOGUS4 'nada'; print "done with 4th bogus "; INTERNALS
Diagnostic messages derive from the perldiag.pod file when available at runtime. Otherwise, they may be embedded in the file itself when the splain package is built. See the Makefile for details. If an extant $SIG{__WARN__} handler is discovered, it will continue to be honored, but only after the diagnostics::splainthis() function (the module's $SIG{__WARN__} interceptor) has had its way with your warnings. There is a $diagnostics::DEBUG variable you may set if you're desperately curious what sorts of things are being intercepted. BEGIN { $diagnostics::DEBUG = 1 } BUGS
Not being able to say "no diagnostics" is annoying, but may not be insurmountable. The "-pretty" directive is called too late to affect matters. You have to do this instead, and before you load the module. BEGIN { $diagnostics::PRETTY = 1 } I could start up faster by delaying compilation until it should be needed, but this gets a "panic: top_level" when using the pragma form in Perl 5.001e. While it's true that this documentation is somewhat subserious, if you use a program named splain, you should expect a bit of whimsy. AUTHOR
Tom Christiansen <tchrist@mox.perl.com>, 25 June 1995. perl v5.18.2 2018-08-17 SPLAIN(1)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:16 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy