What you are seeing is most likely file system caching. Solaris considers unused memory a waste, so it parks (caches) data read from files or written to files in memory because it improves performance. The kernel will release file caches anytime there is a need for more memory.
Last edited by jim mcnamara; 12-18-2012 at 11:36 AM..
Could someone point me in the correct direction or web link containing instructions for installing the System Performance Tool (aka STP) software on an IBM-AIX version 4.? machine. My client has the software (that came from their original server) on a 3" floppy. Thanks! (1 Reply)
I'm running Solaris 8 on a Sun ULTRA 5(SPARC II CPU, 270 MHz) with 64 Mb of RAM.
The machine is very, very slow even doing normal tasks such as reading mail....... I'm nearly afraid to ask it to do some real work.......
On checking out the machine(which I only received last week from our IT... (1 Reply)
I need to prepare script which will run as background process ever 30 mins to collect the following information
1. Memory usage.
2. CPU usage.
3. Number processors running.
4. System resource (CPU and Memory) used by each process.
5. Number of sessions logged
PLEASE HELP ME OUT FROM THIS
... (2 Replies)
Anyone know how to fetch the system performance information by the function except the system command? These information includes CPU load,memory usage,network load,disk capacity,etc. (5 Replies)
I have received an order from upper level manager to "verify system information via Perform/predict'. They asks me to *predict* the system performance. How can I do it as a system admin without the help of application admins and DBAs?
Thanks! (6 Replies)
Dear experts ,
Pls advice for any good Tool to monitor the CPU and performance of AIX the system ..
to keep monitoring to show me the utilization of that system .. (12 Replies)
hi every body i want to check system performance i usually use glance,top,sar and swapinfo but i confused in something so i need explanation about memory issue
first i want check the memory usage i used glance i found this parameter so i need one shows me the differences between these... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: maxim42
2 Replies
LEARN ABOUT V7
set_color
set_color(1) fish set_color(1)NAME
set_color - set_color - set the terminal color
set_color - set the terminal color
Synopsis
set_color [-v --version] [-h --help] [-b --background COLOR] [COLOR]
Description
Change the foreground and/or background color of the terminal. COLOR is one of black, red, green, brown, yellow, blue, magenta, purple,
cyan, white and normal.
o -b, --background Set the background color
o -c, --print-colors Prints a list of all valid color names
o -h, --help Display help message and exit
o -o, --bold Set bold or extra bright mode
o -u, --underline Set underlined mode
o -v, --version Display version and exit
Calling set_color normal will set the terminal color to whatever is the default color of the terminal.
Some terminals use the --bold escape sequence to switch to a brighter color set. On such terminals, set_color white will result in a grey
font color, while set_color --bold white will result in a white font color.
Not all terminal emulators support all these features. This is not a bug in set_color but a missing feature in the terminal emulator.
set_color uses the terminfo database to look up how to change terminal colors on whatever terminal is in use. Some systems have old and
incomplete terminfo databases, and may lack color information for terminals that support it. Download and install the latest version of
ncurses and recompile fish against it in order to fix this issue.
Version 1.23.1 Sun Jan 8 2012 set_color(1)