02-14-2008
Here's an example of dumping the symbols from an object file (hello world in foo.c -> foo.o):
me@mine:~$ objdump -t foo.o
foo.o: file format elf32-i386
SYMBOL TABLE:
00000000 l df *ABS* 00000000 foo.c
00000000 l d .text 00000000 .text
00000000 l d .data 00000000 .data
00000000 l d .bss 00000000 .bss
00000000 l d .rodata 00000000 .rodata
00000000 l d .note.GNU-stack 00000000 .note.GNU-stack
00000000 l d .comment 00000000 .comment
00000000 g F .text 00000026 main
00000000 *UND* 00000000 puts
8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting
1. Programming
Hi@all,
I try to compile c code on hpux 11.11 pa-risc 2 with gcc (32bit). I compile with the option -g, so that I get the symbol table, but it is not available. Does someone knows something on this?
thx (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: Dom_Cyrus
2 Replies
2. Linux
Folks,
I have some program(Test.cpp) as follows,
#include<iostream>
class Abc
{
private:
int _theVar;
public :
int printVar();
};
int Abc :: printVar()
{
_theVar=10;
}
main()
{
Abc _t; (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: vinod_chitrali
0 Replies
3. Programming
Folks,
I have some program(Test.cpp) as follows,
#include<iostream>
class Abc
{
private:
int _theVar;
public :
int printVar();
};
int Abc :: printVar()
{
_theVar=10;
}
main()
{
Abc _t; (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: vinod_chitrali
2 Replies
4. Programming
Hi,
is there any command to see symbol table info.
will it show where its allocating memory for varibales golbals & locals and code.(i mean the segments).
i read there is a section called read only data segment and this is where initialized data such as strings stores.
i have wriiten the... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: MrUser
7 Replies
5. Solaris
deleteing post (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: dshakey
0 Replies
6. Shell Programming and Scripting
Hi
I am new to Unix shell scripting. But i need help to slove the below issue.
Issue description:
I want to read table, view names and package names in a file
my plan to find the table name is : search "From" key word find the table or view
To find the packge name : Search "Package... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: sboss
5 Replies
7. Shell Programming and Scripting
If I select the statement on db is ok, but same statement on UNIX script I get
table or view is not exist. what should I do?:( (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: Hscript
5 Replies
8. Programming
Hi,
I am a newbie in Linux land, and I have a question about programming parent/child process interaction:
How do I search the value of a symbol in the child process? Is it possible?
I am doing a fork() and execve() to spawn any child possible, and I need something on the parent side to... (12 Replies)
Discussion started by: alphakili
12 Replies
UTF2(5) BSD File Formats Manual UTF2(5)
NAME
utf2 -- Universal character set Transformation Format encoding of runes
SYNOPSIS
ENCODING "UTF2"
DESCRIPTION
The UTF2 encoding has been deprecated in favour of UTF-8. New applications should not use UTF2.
The UTF2 encoding is based on a proposed X-Open multibyte FSS-UCS-TF (File System Safe Universal Character Set Transformation Format) encod-
ing as used in Plan 9 from Bell Labs. Although it is capable of representing more than 16 bits, the current implementation is limited to 16
bits as defined by the Unicode Standard.
UTF2 representation is backwards compatible with ASCII, so 0x00-0x7f refer to the ASCII character set. The multibyte encoding of runes
between 0x0080 and 0xffff consist entirely of bytes whose high order bit is set. The actual encoding is represented by the following table:
[0x0000 - 0x007f] [00000000.0bbbbbbb] -> 0bbbbbbb
[0x0080 - 0x07ff] [00000bbb.bbbbbbbb] -> 110bbbbb, 10bbbbbb
[0x0800 - 0xffff] [bbbbbbbb.bbbbbbbb] -> 1110bbbb, 10bbbbbb, 10bbbbbb
If more than a single representation of a value exists (for example, 0x00; 0xC0 0x80; 0xE0 0x80 0x80) the shortest representation is always
used (but the longer ones will be correctly decoded).
The final three encodings provided by X-Open:
[00000000.000bbbbb.bbbbbbbb.bbbbbbbb] ->
11110bbb, 10bbbbbb, 10bbbbbb, 10bbbbbb
[000000bb.bbbbbbbb.bbbbbbbb.bbbbbbbb] ->
111110bb, 10bbbbbb, 10bbbbbb, 10bbbbbb, 10bbbbbb
[0bbbbbbb.bbbbbbbb.bbbbbbbb.bbbbbbbb] ->
1111110b, 10bbbbbb, 10bbbbbb, 10bbbbbb, 10bbbbbb, 10bbbbbb
which provides for the entire proposed ISO-10646 31 bit standard are currently not implemented.
SEE ALSO
mklocale(1), setlocale(3), utf8(5)
BSD
October 11, 2002 BSD