Quote:
|
Originally Posted by matrixmadhan
I couldnt understand the statements really!
So, the difference is in these two,
Code:
AAABB370 role1 role3 role2
AAABB374 role1 role3 role6 role2
And if you could see that,
when you say the needed output should be
AAABB370 role3 role2
and not AAABB370 role1 role2 role3
... how is role2 matched with AAABB370 then ? ....
' role2 ' should not be displayed with AAABB370 as per your statement.
Either of the case pattern is matched MI_REC_DUP is matched with MI_REC with role2
T
Sorry, If I havent understood it correctly!
I believe am getting the output as you had said before.
If not clear, please post with clarifications !  |
Opps!! sorry..
The output should be:
AAABB370 role3 (without the role2)
AAABB371 role3
AAABB372 role3 role4
AAABB373 role6 role5
AAABB374 role1 role2 role3 role6
For clarification:
AAABB370 cannot have role1 and role2 because his role is MI_REC_DUP and not MI_REC.
AAABB374 should have role1 and role2 because it has tha exact name of MI_REC.
Hope its clearer this time..
