Sponsored Content
Full Discussion: fork() and IPC
Top Forums Programming fork() and IPC Post 2700 by TelePlayer on Wednesday 30th of May 2001 03:52:47 PM
Old 05-30-2001
fork() and IPC

Hey all. I recently ported a multithreaded program from WinNT to LINUX using pthreads. Everything works fine, except that it turns out the drivers for the hardware I'm working with aren't thread safe. So, now I have to find a way to make this multi-process instead of multi-threaded.

I just started working with fork(), and am having a little trouble following the interprocess communication models. Is there an "easy" way to allow a child process(es) to have access to the global variables in the parent process? This is the way the original programmer did it under NT multithreaded, and I'd rather not rewrite the entire app (it's big).
 

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Ipc

I have a parent that is passing data to child A and then child A has to process it and pass to child B. I am able to pass the data to child A but am not able to pass it to child B. Child B seems to only be receiving the last data instead of the whole data. I saw one example in a book but it uses... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: scmay
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Ipc Details

hai, i am doing my masters degree in computers.please any one tell me about fork(),semaphores,mutex,messaging queues,messaging using pipes ,and msgget(),msgrecv() funtions in ipc programming . i have exam on that i have a book but in that they not given clearly. hope u will ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: G.Vishnuvardhan
2 Replies

3. Programming

[C] Problem with IPC

Hi! I'm trying to write this program: in my intentions it should get a message and send it to a second process (pid_upost), then to a third process (pid1, pid2, pid3, depending on the choice made when a new message is inserted). This program should write the message in a file (message1, message2 or... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: Kaminski
1 Replies

4. Programming

IPC with PIPE

Hi guys, I'm new to Linux and Unix I have just simple code . But I don't know why it doesn't work .. But, the outputfile is Blank.. I don't understand why.. Please help me.. Thank you very much P.S: sorry, I don't know how to edit this post clearly.. it's hard to read.. Please try.. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: thanh_sam_khac
2 Replies

5. Solaris

errors on Netra-440: "IPC Warning: ipc: tcp_protocol: bad magic number"

I was asked to look into a problem with a Sun Netra 440 in another department. On the server in question, the relevant 'uname -a' information is, "SunOS host1 5.9 Generic_118558-16 sun4u sparc SUNW,Netra-440". That information aside, while the other admin is logged into the ALOM, these errors are... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Borealis
0 Replies

6. Programming

IPC Mechanisms

Hi! I wanted to know the advantages / disadvantages of different IPC mechanims such as sockets, pipes (unnamed) , shared memory & message queues. Pipes for example i hear are fast , but are difficult to debug as compared to sockets. Can you guys please name some situations where one is... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: _korg
4 Replies

7. Programming

IPC-using fork() in a loop

I need to write a program which creates some n number of processes first and also creates a fifo for each of them, then it connects to the server and.. I tried creating these processes with fork() in a for loop but it doesn't print out what i write inside the child.. for(int count = 0; count... (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: saman_glorious
7 Replies

8. Programming

Best IPC mechanism to be used

Suppose I have 5 independent process divided in two imaginay sets: set1 set2 --------------------- p1 p3 | | p2 p4 | p5 The processes inside each set communicate mutually quite often. I mean p1 and p2 communicate mutually quite often Similarly p3, p4 and p5 communicate mutually... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: rupeshkp728
2 Replies

9. HP-UX

IPC settings on HP-UX

Hi Experts, Need your help for checking te interprocess communications settings on HP-UX box. Using ipcs command I am able to view Message queue,semapohores etc, but from that output I m not able to understand how to determine if there is any issue with ipc settings and how to resolve that? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sai_2507
1 Replies

10. Shell Programming and Scripting

help with IPC + thread

Actually i am thinking of some usefull application that involves both IPC and pthreads.But i am not quite sure what type of application involves both these together :confused:. Anyways i am now working on creating a simple featured file manager that can do the following: Display file name and... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: ronmaximus
2 Replies
PTHREAD_ATFORK(3P)					     POSIX Programmer's Manual						PTHREAD_ATFORK(3P)

PROLOG
This manual page is part of the POSIX Programmer's Manual. The Linux implementation of this interface may differ (consult the correspond- ing Linux manual page for details of Linux behavior), or the interface may not be implemented on Linux. NAME
pthread_atfork - register fork handlers SYNOPSIS
#include <pthread.h> int pthread_atfork(void (*prepare)(void), void (*parent)(void), void (*child)(void)); DESCRIPTION
The pthread_atfork() function shall declare fork handlers to be called before and after fork(), in the context of the thread that called fork(). The prepare fork handler shall be called before fork() processing commences. The parent fork handle shall be called after fork() processing completes in the parent process. The child fork handler shall be called after fork() processing completes in the child process. If no handling is desired at one or more of these three points, the corresponding fork handler address(es) may be set to NULL. The order of calls to pthread_atfork() is significant. The parent and child fork handlers shall be called in the order in which they were established by calls to pthread_atfork(). The prepare fork handlers shall be called in the opposite order. RETURN VALUE
Upon successful completion, pthread_atfork() shall return a value of zero; otherwise, an error number shall be returned to indicate the error. ERRORS
The pthread_atfork() function shall fail if: ENOMEM Insufficient table space exists to record the fork handler addresses. The pthread_atfork() function shall not return an error code of [EINTR]. The following sections are informative. EXAMPLES
None. APPLICATION USAGE
None. RATIONALE
There are at least two serious problems with the semantics of fork() in a multi-threaded program. One problem has to do with state (for example, memory) covered by mutexes. Consider the case where one thread has a mutex locked and the state covered by that mutex is inconsis- tent while another thread calls fork(). In the child, the mutex is in the locked state (locked by a nonexistent thread and thus can never be unlocked). Having the child simply reinitialize the mutex is unsatisfactory since this approach does not resolve the question about how to correct or otherwise deal with the inconsistent state in the child. It is suggested that programs that use fork() call an exec function very soon afterwards in the child process, thus resetting all states. In the meantime, only a short list of async-signal-safe library routines are promised to be available. Unfortunately, this solution does not address the needs of multi-threaded libraries. Application programs may not be aware that a multi- threaded library is in use, and they feel free to call any number of library routines between the fork() and exec calls, just as they always have. Indeed, they may be extant single-threaded programs and cannot, therefore, be expected to obey new restrictions imposed by the threads library. On the other hand, the multi-threaded library needs a way to protect its internal state during fork() in case it is re-entered later in the child process. The problem arises especially in multi-threaded I/O libraries, which are almost sure to be invoked between the fork() and exec calls to effect I/O redirection. The solution may require locking mutex variables during fork(), or it may entail simply resetting the state in the child after the fork() processing completes. The pthread_atfork() function provides multi-threaded libraries with a means to protect themselves from innocent application programs that call fork(), and it provides multi-threaded application programs with a standard mechanism for protecting themselves from fork() calls in a library routine or the application itself. The expected usage is that the prepare handler acquires all mutex locks and the other two fork handlers release them. For example, an application can supply a prepare routine that acquires the necessary mutexes the library maintains and supply child and parent routines that release those mutexes, thus ensuring that the child gets a consistent snapshot of the state of the library (and that no mutexes are left stranded). Alternatively, some libraries might be able to supply just a child routine that reinitializes the mutexes in the library and all associated states to some known value (for example, what it was when the image was originally executed). When fork() is called, only the calling thread is duplicated in the child process. Synchronization variables remain in the same state in the child as they were in the parent at the time fork() was called. Thus, for example, mutex locks may be held by threads that no longer exist in the child process, and any associated states may be inconsistent. The parent process may avoid this by explicit code that acquires and releases locks critical to the child via pthread_atfork(). In addition, any critical threads need to be recreated and reini- tialized to the proper state in the child (also via pthread_atfork()). A higher-level package may acquire locks on its own data structures before invoking lower-level packages. Under this scenario, the order specified for fork handler calls allows a simple rule of initialization for avoiding package deadlock: a package initializes all packages on which it depends before it calls the pthread_atfork() function for itself. FUTURE DIRECTIONS
None. SEE ALSO
atexit(), fork(), the Base Definitions volume of IEEE Std 1003.1-2001, <sys/types.h> COPYRIGHT
Portions of this text are reprinted and reproduced in electronic form from IEEE Std 1003.1, 2003 Edition, Standard for Information Technol- ogy -- Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX), The Open Group Base Specifications Issue 6, Copyright (C) 2001-2003 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc and The Open Group. In the event of any discrepancy between this version and the original IEEE and The Open Group Standard, the original IEEE and The Open Group Standard is the referee document. The original Standard can be obtained online at http://www.opengroup.org/unix/online.html . IEEE
/The Open Group 2003 PTHREAD_ATFORK(3P)
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 PM.
Unix & Linux Forums Content Copyright 1993-2022. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy